每個業主的房子背後都有著不同的故事，
有些是傳承，有些是新尋覓，
有些為了環境，有些為了便利...
但是每個不同基地都有著各自的特殊表情
攝於淡水案
我想起之前有位業主曾說過：房子就像情人一樣，你無法認真尋覓得來，
一切都是 [緣份]
Showing posts with label 碎碎唸. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 碎碎唸. Show all posts
11.15.2010
10.06.2010
7.17.2010
言教不如身教
在這期七月的 Wallpaper 雜誌專題 Taiwan revealed 中介紹了許多台灣的形象及創意，
包括一些致力於藝文以及設計等各領域的人物，其中二位正是大學時期的指導教授。
我想【堅持】是你們給的最好身教！！
呂理煌
楊家凱
............................................................................................................................
觀光局與 Wallpaper 雜誌合作推出 Taiwan revealed 專題
交通部觀光局新聞稿
交通部觀光局這幾年來創意連連，屢出奇招。前年推出插畫式的廣告創意，不但令人眼睛一亮，更培養出許多粉絲，專門收集廣告圖案所衍生製作的宣傳紀念品。今年更以創意設計的角度切入，與藝術設計界知名之Wallpaper雜誌合作推出Taiwan revealed專輯，希望跨越台灣觀光低知名度的侷限，以突破傳統、顛覆的手法，非廣告的方式，成功傳達台灣觀光是精緻而有品質的訊息。
該雜誌由英國總部在今年四月間指派攝製團隊到台進行14天的採訪作業，荷蘭籍世界知名攝影師Dana Lixenberg戴娜．黎生博也是其中一員，到台進行景點拍攝時，不慎在計程車上遺失皮包，沒想到次日清晨，計程車司機把她的皮包送回住宿的旅館，讓戴娜與工作團隊直呼不可思議，深為台灣人的誠實與善良大為感動，因而留下深刻難忘的印象。交通部觀光局局長賴瑟珍聽到這樁真實的故事，也連說：這就是台灣，令人感動的台灣。
Wallpaper團隊以滿滿感動完成的台灣專輯將於七月刊出版，會以觀光局積極推廣的自行車旅遊角度切入，引領讀者神遊台灣；會以採訪曾獲知名建築獎之台灣建築菁英，讓讀者從現代建築如101，到老建築的保留看當代台灣建築發展的脈絡；也有深獲國際藝術界矚目之台灣當代藝術家如書法家董陽孜、雲門舞集的林懷民大師為讀者展現台灣奔騰的創意及深具活力的文化面向；而不容錯過的美食，則透過介紹台灣之時尚餐廳，包括由知名建築師設計之餐廳、裝璜獨具風格之餐廳、知名台菜...等，將台灣美食兼具美味與美感的形象推上國際舞台。
戴娜的作品常見於The New Yorker紐約客雜誌、The New York Times Magazine、Vanity Fair浮華世界等世界級媒體。
5.05.2010
4.06.2010
4.14.2009
The possibilities at the cutting-edge
Being in 21 century now, architecture is more free and flexible by computer design. The so-called digital architecture theory involves continued expectations of innovative computer graphic software and new images in the century. On the other hand, I am also considering about if this "conceptual image thinking method" would achieve the aim of "space of folding".
Recently (in the information era), almost everything has been influenced by the information age including the architecture. Since 1963 the fast invention of computer skill which include CAAD, A.I, 3D animation, model making have deeply impact to architecture design. Therefore there are multiple style of images that we can imagine in this digital era. When digital architecture this strong trend power comes, the definition of "digital architecture" still been debate and query. If the architects are satisfied with their "ART" works, do people like to live in the house, which covered by pc and internet? Some architects said "architecture is a liberated form" so the "free from" appears, another architects said "architecture is a container of information" so the "digital wall" appears…
Compared to the traditional architecture the digital architecture use computers or digital systems to help create or design even build, and the digital one use the different types of space environments, the differences are lots of combine information involved in digital design which is totally different than the traditional one. Every era has different technology, now the "digital" and "information" are the peculiarities. Apparently the changes are not only the form of the architecture but also the thoughts and process of design.
"The so-called [smart house] of tomorrow will be characterized not by its architecture, properly speaking, but by small-scale gadgets and the information systems to which they call wired." [1]
Since 1990 the digital technology made the form and space of architectures changed to curved lines or surfaces, so architecture became soft and the space inside became flexible. But when we look at all the forms that we called it "digital" are all free form and smooth. Could "free form" be "HARD" ? Or another types of free form which with lots of straight angles?
Recently (in the information era), almost everything has been influenced by the information age including the architecture. Since 1963 the fast invention of computer skill which include CAAD, A.I, 3D animation, model making have deeply impact to architecture design. Therefore there are multiple style of images that we can imagine in this digital era. When digital architecture this strong trend power comes, the definition of "digital architecture" still been debate and query. If the architects are satisfied with their "ART" works, do people like to live in the house, which covered by pc and internet? Some architects said "architecture is a liberated form" so the "free from" appears, another architects said "architecture is a container of information" so the "digital wall" appears…
Compared to the traditional architecture the digital architecture use computers or digital systems to help create or design even build, and the digital one use the different types of space environments, the differences are lots of combine information involved in digital design which is totally different than the traditional one. Every era has different technology, now the "digital" and "information" are the peculiarities. Apparently the changes are not only the form of the architecture but also the thoughts and process of design.
"The so-called [smart house] of tomorrow will be characterized not by its architecture, properly speaking, but by small-scale gadgets and the information systems to which they call wired." [1]
Since 1990 the digital technology made the form and space of architectures changed to curved lines or surfaces, so architecture became soft and the space inside became flexible. But when we look at all the forms that we called it "digital" are all free form and smooth. Could "free form" be "HARD" ? Or another types of free form which with lots of straight angles?
Too many possibilities...
J' @ UCA UK
Reference:
[1] J.Abbott Miller, Sings and Spaces, New York. Rockport Publisher, page 9
[1] J.Abbott Miller, Sings and Spaces, New York. Rockport Publisher, page 9
4.04.2009
原生設計
The Essentials
近十年來的資訊觸角蔓延異常迅速,遍及各種領域層面
這世界也被繁雜的"多樣性"所覆蓋著
雖然"多樣性"豐富了生活的表面
但或許實質上在表象下的意義是略顯空虛的
在建築的領域裡,因數位科技的發達
各種形體被塑造的可能性,已經幾乎不是天方夜譚
各種可應用的材質也一一被發展...
大量的花樣材質搭配上基本元素鐵件,玻璃,鋼骨,石材...etc
乍看之下或許我們可以用"現代建築"來形容他
至少在表象上的某一方面（材質）滿足了當代的需求
但說不出似乎少了些某種不存在的東西
是"精神"嗎？是"意義"嗎？還是都不是？
也因為如此,所以"獨特性"的建築風格更能在紛亂的時代發人省思
安藤的清水混泥土,外觀材質具有"單一性",原始的材質能引導人們對空間的思惟多一些,而不是只focus在表皮上！
而Gehry 的鈦金屬skin建築,是另一種"單一性"的表徵,他將最新的科技打造出新建築的皮膚,
流線不規則的量體,讓人們重新思考建築量體的外型可行性
還有ZAHA 的curving , TOYO ITO的carving...
回到室內更小的範疇內,
我們常思考著空間設計的重點到底是什麼？
是業主的需求？花俏的造型,多變的材質？
這些充其量不過是台式的表面裝潢工作,再多的材質,再多的造型總會"膩"吧！
真正能讓人感受到的,不外乎是些自然的基礎元素
灑落的陽光,流動空氣,搖曳的光影,順暢的動線
與活動在空間的人們互動的狀態...
我們的生活方式可以改變嗎？
近年來在台灣流行起的,LOHAS,自然風,單車風
不就是在複雜的生活現狀中,找回原始的純真而已嗎？
換個角度思考,我們的生活中可放棄的"不必要性"元素實在太多
滿足的基本生存需求,是否其他都是多餘的呢？
空間上亦是如此
基本的機能需求滿足了,是否可以不需要其他的綴飾？
不是極簡風,也不是現代風,更不是所謂文字可定義的XX風...
先遺忘所有生活上的負擔,讓基礎機能滿足你的基本需求,
其他的空間就暫時放空吧！
老梗說: LESS IS MORE !
7.16.2008
十年一覺 設計夢
接觸設計這塊已經進入第十四年了
當年勇敢的高三生,不畏爆肝惡操出了名的設計界,硬是卡了個位進去...
學習的經歷雖然咬牙硬撐過來了,但是回想起,還是心有餘悸...
尤其是要評圖的前夕,大家都ㄘㄨㄚˋㄟ等~
尤其是期末的更是恐怖,系上的老師總覺得自己下手不夠狠
還找了一堆他校的名師來蹂躪脆弱的我們...
大學好不容易喘完了,結果自己很牙ㄍㄟˊ的申請了英國的碩士班
又操了將近二年...
每晚含淚入眠,夢中被論文壓死...宿舍地上滿滿的圖書館書籍多到沒地方站...
但是國外的學習經驗更是寶貴～
學習了這麼久,應該投入業界嗎？
天生反骨的我當然不會呀！所以跑去搞廣告...
結果過沒多久我還是回到設計這個小圈圈...
現實生活中的設計不再能天馬行空
很多時候,應該說99.999%都要回歸到基本預算上
但往往都忽略掉怎麼做才能提升生活品味及創新水準
一分錢一分貨的千古定律,往往都在預算書中迷失掉了...
無形中細微的流失,微妙的差異,很多時候我們都無法察覺～
被過度消費的創意,C/P值不再是一切...
4.18.2008
Significance
design driven by nature, nature inspired design
設計,提供的是一種新的觀念,一種新的生活形態
在盒子內的形隨機能,或是機能隨形的思考
都脫離不了環境,與習慣行為模式
呼吸的空間與能量的累積
融入生活之中
美學,生活科學,人文素養
這應該才是設計的核心價值
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
